Presupuesto público en salud y sus efectos en la desnutrición crónica infantil. El caso peruano / Public health budget and its effects on chronic child malnutrition. The Peruvian case / Orçamento da saúde pública e seus efeitos sobre a desnutrição infantil crônica. O caso peruano

En la actualidad, aunque las tasas de malnutrición que afectan a los pueblos indígenas y a las zonas de bajos ingresos han disminuido en un 33,8%, América Latina sigue registrando niveles alarmantes de malnutrición, especialmente a nivel infantil. En el caso de Perú en particular, urge estudiar el impacto del presupuesto sanitario en la dinámica de la desnutrición infantil. Objetivo. Analizar la incidencia del presupuesto de salud pública en la reducción de la desnutrición infantil en Perú durante las dos últimas décadas. Metodología. Revisión narrativa acerca del impacto de los presupuestos de salud pública en la desnutrición. Dentro de busqueda se consideraron bases de datos como Scopus, Web of Science, Scielo, Redalyc, Latindex y Google Scholar desde el 2019 a 2023. Considerando con ecuación health budget" OR "chronic child malnutrition", "government spending" con la función booleana AND como parámetros de búsqueda para el campo "topic" para encontrar documentos que también trataran sobre "malnutrition" OR "chronic child malnutrition" OR "child malnutrition". Resultados. Se identificaron 57 fuente, se excluyeron 4 artículos por duplicidad y 37 por falta de información, dando como resultando un total de 16 artículos a considerar en este análisis. Conclusión. Se puede concluir que existe una relación significativa entre el aumento del presupuesto público en salud y la disminución de la desnutrición infantil a nivel nacional. La literatura existente destaca que a medida que se incrementa la asignación presupuestaria en el ámbito de la salud, se observa una reducción correspondiente en las tasas de desnutrición.

Currently, although malnutrition rates affecting indigenous peoples and low-income areas have decreased by 33.8%, Latin America continues to register alarming levels of malnutrition, especially at the child level. In the case of Peru in particular, there is an urgent need to study the impact of the health budget on the dynamics of child malnutrition. Objective. To analyze the impact of the public health budget on the reduction of child malnutrition in Peru during the last two decades. Methodology. Narrative review of the impact of public health budgets on malnutrition. Within the search, databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, Scielo, Redalyc, Latindex and Google Scholar from 2019 to 2023 were considered. Considering with equation health budget" OR "chronic child malnutrition", "government spending" with the Boolean function AND as search parameters for the field "topic" to find documents that also dealt with "malnutrition" OR "chronic child malnutrition" OR "child malnutrition". Results. Fifty-seven sources were identified, 4 articles were excluded due to duplicity and 37 due to lack of information, resulting in a total of 16 articles to be considered in this analysis. Conclusion. It can be concluded that there is a significant relationship between the increase in the public health budget and the decrease in child malnutrition at the national level. The existing literature highlights that as the health budget allocation increases, a corresponding reduction in malnutrition rates is observed.

Atualmente, embora as taxas de desnutrição que afetam os povos indígenas e as áreas de baixa renda tenham diminuído em 33,8%, a América Latina continua a registrar níveis alarmantes de desnutrição, especialmente no nível infantil. No caso do Peru, em particular, há uma necessidade urgente de estudar o impacto do orçamento da saúde na dinâmica da desnutrição infantil. Objetivo. Analisar o impacto do orçamento da saúde pública na redução da desnutrição infantil no Peru nas últimas duas décadas. Metodologia. Revisão narrativa do impacto dos orçamentos públicos de saúde sobre a desnutrição. Bases de dados como Scopus, Web of Science, Scielo, Redalyc, Latindex e Google Scholar de 2019 a 2023 foram consideradas na pesquisa. Considerando com equação "health budget" OR "chronic child malnutrition", "government spending" com a função booleana AND como parâmetros de pesquisa para o campo "topic" para encontrar documentos que também tratassem de "malnutrition" OR "chronic child malnutrition" OR "child malnutrition". Resultados. Foram identificadas 57 fontes, 4 artigos foram excluídos devido à duplicação e 37 devido à falta de informações, resultando em um total de 16 artigos a serem considerados nesta análise. Conclusão. Pode-se concluir que existe uma relação significativa entre o aumento do orçamento da saúde pública e a redução da desnutrição infantil em nível nacional. A literatura existente destaca que, à medida que a alocação do orçamento de saúde aumenta, observa-se uma redução correspondente nas taxas de desnutrição.

Gasto de bolsillo en salud en la familia con diabetes-hipertensión durante la pandemia del covid-19 / Out-of-pocket health spending in the family with diabetes-hypertension during the covid-19 pandemic

Determinar el gasto de bolsillo en salud en las familias con diabetes mellitus y/o hipertensión arterial y el porcentaje del ingreso familiar durante la pandemia del Covid-19. Estudio de gasto de bolsillo en salud que incluyó muestreo consecutivo de 268 familias de México. El ingreso trimestral familiar se definió como la suma de ingresos de cada uno de los integrantes de la familia, el gasto en salud se definió como el total de erogaciones que tuvo la familia para cubrir los diferentes servicios de salud, y porcentaje de gasto en salud se definió como la relación del gasto total trimestral y el gasto corriente del hogar, valores expresados en pesos mexicanos. El promedio trimestral del gasto de bolsillo en salud en la familia con diabetes mellitus y/o hipertensión arterial en la dimensión consulta fue $975,82 y en la dimensión medicamentos $1,371.22; el gasto promedio total trimestral fue $3,133.08. El ingreso trimestral de la familia después de la pandemia del covid-19 fue $85,348.86 lo que representa 5,93% menos del ingreso trimestral antes de la pandemia. El gasto trimestral en salud fue $3,133.08, lo cual corresponde a 3,45% y 3,67% del ingreso trimestral familiar antes y después de la pandemia del Covid-19 respectivamente (AU)

Determine out-of-pocket health spending in families with diabetes mellitus and/or high blood pressure and the percentage of family income during the Covid-19 pandemic. Study of out-of-pocket health spending that included consecutive sampling of 268 families in Mexico. The quarterly family income was defined as the sum of income of each of the family members, health spending was defined as the total expenses that the family had to cover the different health services, and percentage of health spending. It was defined as the relationship between total quarterly expenditure and current household expenditure, values expressed in Mexican pesos. The quarterly average of out-of-pocket health expenditure in the family with diabetes mellitus and/or arterial hypertension in the consultation dimension was $975.82 and in the medication dimension $1,371.22; The average total quarterly expense was $3,133.08. The family's quarterly income after the covid-19 pandemic was $85,348.86, which represents 5.93% less than the quarterly income before the pandemic. The quarterly health expenditure was $3,133.08, which corresponds to 3.45% and 3.67% of the family's quarterly income before and after the Covid-19 pandemic respectively (AU)

Characterization of patients with acutely decompensated cirrhosis who received care in different highly complex emergency services of Medellín, Colombia

Introduction. Cirrhosis is one of the ten leading causes of death in the Western hemisphere and entails a significant cost of health care. Objective. To describe the sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of patients older than 18 years who received care for acute decompensation of cirrhosis in the emergency services of three highly complex centers in Medellín, Colombia. Materials and methods. This was an observational retrospective cohort study from clinical records. The results were analyzed by frequency measures and represented in tables and graphics. Results. In total, 576 clinical records met the inclusion criteria; 287 were included for analysis, and 58.9% were men, with an average age of 64 (± 13.5) years. The most frequent causes of cirrhosis were alcohol intake (47.7%), cryptogenic or unspecified etiology (29.6%), and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (9.1%). The main reasons for visiting the emergency department were the presence of edema and/or ascites (34.1%), suspicion of gastrointestinal bleeding (26.5%), abdominal pain (14.3%) and altered mental status (13.9%). The most frequent clinical manifestations of an acute decompensation of cirrhosis were ascites (45.6%), variceal hemorrhage (25.4%), hepatic encephalopathy (23.0%), and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (5.2%). During their treatment, 56.1% of the patients received intravenous antibiotics; 24.0%, human albumin; 24.0%, vasoactive support, and 27.5%, blood products; 21.3% required management in an intensive or intermediate care unit, registering 53 deceased patients for a mortality of 18.5%. Conclusion. Patients who consult the emergency services due to acute decompensation of cirrhosis demand a high amount of health resources, frequently present associated complications, and a high percentage requires management in critical care units and shows a high in-hospital mortality rate.

Introducción. La cirrosis hace parte de las diez primeras causas de muerte en el hemisferio occidental y acarrea un importante costo en salud. Objetivo. Describir las características sociodemográficas, clínicas y de laboratorio, de los pacientes mayores de 18 años que recibieron atención por descompensación aguda de la cirrosis en los servicios de urgencias de tres centros de alta complejidad en Medellín, Colombia. Materiales y métodos. Se trata de un estudio observacional de cohorte. Los resultados se analizaron mediante medidas de frecuencia, y se representaron en tablas y gráficas. Resultados. En total, en 576 registros clínicos se cumplieron los criterios de inclusión; se incluyeron 287 para el análisis. El 58,9 % fueron hombres, con edad promedio de 64 (± 13,5) años. Las causas más frecuentes de cirrosis fueron: ingestión de alcohol (47,7 %), criptogénica o inespecífica (29,6 %) y enfermedad por hígado graso no alcohólico (9,1 %). Los principales motivos de consulta fueron: presencia de edemas, ascitis o ambas (34,1 %), sospecha de hemorragia digestiva (26,5 %), dolor abdominal (14,3 %) y alteración del estado mental (13,9 %). Los diagnósticos de complicación aguda más frecuentes fueron ascitis (45,6 %), hemorragia digestiva por várices esofágicas (25,4 %), encefalopatía hepática (23,0 %) y peritonitis bacteriana espontánea (5,2 %). El 56,1 % de los pacientes recibió antibióticos; el 24,0 %, albúmina humana; el 24,0 % medicamentos, y el 27,5 % hemoderivados. En el 21,3 % de los casos, se requirió hospitalización en la unidad de cuidados intensivos o en la de cuidados intermedios. Se registraron 53 decesos, para una mortalidad del 18,5 %. Conclusiones. Los pacientes que consultan a los servicios de urgencias por una descompensación aguda de la cirrosis demandan una gran cantidad de recursos, frecuentemente presentan complicaciones asociadas, requieren manejo en unidades de cuidado crítico y evidencian una alta tasa de mortalidad.

Expenditure Incurred by Patients of Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis Under Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme in District Tuberculosis Center, Jammu

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) patients suffer enormously due to huge cost on diagnosis and treatment. This study aims to assess the total expenditure and its predictors among patients of TB. Methodology: A longitudinal study was conducted among TB Patients registered in first quarter of 2018 at District Tuberculosis Center, Jammu. Data was collected by interviewing the patients and their attendants. Statistical significance of median expenditure between patients of pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB in rela-tion to various predictors was assessed using nonparametric tests followed by Multiple Linear Regression. Results: Total median cost, median direct and indirect cost incurred by a TB patient were recorded as USD 489.55, USD 246.55 and USD 229.5 respectively. Treatment costs were slightly higher in patients of pulmo-nary TB in comparison to extrapulmonary TB (p>0.05). On bivariate analysis, upper class, previously treated patients, Category 2 patients, with chronic illnesses, with guardians and who were employed expended signif-icantly higher amounts on their treatment, but on multivariate analysis, only formal employment, current earning and being reimbursed significantly predicted the total cost (p < .001, adjusted R square = 0.56). Conclusion: Huge direct costs incurred by patients is a matter of great concern, more so as the Indian gov-ernment has made all diagnostics and treatment free since the inception of the RNTCP.

Radiografía al acceso en artroplastia de rodilla entre los beneficiarios del Fondo Nacional de Salud entre 2004 y 2021 / Access to knee arthroplasty among National Health Fund beneficiaries in Chile between 2004 and 2021

Introducción La artrosis de rodilla es una patología que afecta la calidad de vida, siendo la artroplastía de rodilla un tratamiento costo-efectivo para la etapa severa de esta enfermedad. El acceso a artroplastia de rodilla es un indicador de salud de la Organización de Cooperación y Desarrollo Económico. Los objetivos de este estudio son determinar la incidencia de artroplastia de rodilla entre 2004 y 2021 en los beneficiarios del Fondo Nacional de Salud en Chile, la proporción que se operaron en el sistema privado y estimar el gasto del bolsillo del paciente para operarse. Método Estudio transversal. Se utilizó la base de datos del Departamento de Estadística e Información de Salud. Se pesquisaron pacientes que egresaron de un centro de salud chileno que fueron intervenidos por artroplastia rodilla entre 2004 y 2021. Se analizó la proporción de pacientes por tramo del Fondo Nacional de Salud y si se realizó su cirugía en establecimiento de la red pública o privada. Resultados De las 31 526 intervenciones de artroplastia de rodilla, 21 248 (67,38%) fueron realizadas en pacientes del Fondo Nacional de Salud y 16 238 en instituciones públicas (51,49%). Los pacientes de dicho fondo presentan un alza sistemática en el volumen de artroplastías de rodilla hasta 2019, pero disminuyeron en 2020 y 2021 un 68% y un 51%. Del total de pacientes del sistema público operados de artroplastia de rodilla, 856 (9%) pertenecían al tramo A1, al tramo B 12 806 (60%), al tramo C 2044 (10%) y al tramo D 4421 (21%). Se estimó que el gasto incurrido por estos pacientes varía entre el 24,4 y 27,2%. Las proporciones históricas de acceso en instituciones privadas a esta cirugía son en el tramo A 7%, tramo B 13%, tramo C 24% y tramo D 52%. Conclusión El 50% de las cirugías de artroplastía de rodilla se realizan en instituciones públicas y dos tercios se realizan en pacientes del Fondo Nacional de Salud. El 46% de los tramos C y D se operaron en el sistema privado. La pandemia ha aumentado la brecha de acceso, lo que ha provocado un alza significativa en la proporción de pacientes del Fondo Nacional de Salud de los tramos B, C y D que han migrado al sistema privado para acceder a esta cirugía.

Introduction Knee osteoarthritis affects the quality of life, with knee arthroplasty being a cost-effective treatment for the severe stage of this disease. Access to knee arthroplasty is a health indicator of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The objectives of this study are to determine the incidence of knee arthroplasty between 2004 and 2021 in beneficiaries of the National Health Fund in Chile, the proportion of patients who underwent surgery in the private system, and to estimate the patient's out-of-pocket expenditure for surgery. Methods Cross-sectional study. We used the Department of Statistics and Health Information database. Patients discharged from a Chilean health center who underwent knee arthroplasty surgery between 2004 and 2021 were investigated. We analyzed the proportion of patients by their National Health Fund category and whether their surgery was performed in public or private network facilities. Results Of the 31 526 knee arthroplasty procedures, 21 248 (67.38%) were performed on National Health Fund patients and 16 238 in public institutions (51.49%). Patients from the National Health Fund showed a systematic increase in knee arthroplasty volume until 2019 but decreased in 2020 and 2021 by 68% and 51%. Of the total number of patients in the public system operated on for knee arthroplasty, 856 (9%) belonged to group A1, 12 806 (60%) to group B, 2044 (10%) to group C, and 4421 (21%) to group D. The expenditure incurred by these patients was estimated to vary between 24.4% and 27.2%. The historical proportions of access to this surgery in private institutions are 7% in group A, 13% in group B, 24% in group C, and 52% in group D. Conclusion Fifty percent of knee arthroplasty surgeries are performed in public institutions, and two-thirds are performed on patients of the National Health Fund. Forty-six percent of the C and D groups were operated in the private system. The pandemic has increased the access gap, leading to a substantial increase in the proportion of patients from the National Health Fund of the B, C, and D groups who have migrated to the private system to access this surgery.

Expenditure of biological drugs for rheumatoid arthritis treatment in the Brazilian public health system

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE This work aims to analyze the quantity and expenses related to biological drugs used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in outpatient public care within the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). METHODS It is a cross-sectional descriptive study based on secondary data from a historical series, referring to the purchase, volume, and the number of patients treated with different biological drugs (infliximabe, etanercept, adalimumab, rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab, golimumab, and certolizumab pegol) for RA treatment in outpatient care from 2012 to 2017. The data were extracted from the SUS Outpatient Information System database-SIA/SUS and included ten drugs used for RA treatment. The study assessed the quantity and expenditure of these drugs, the number of RA patients treated, and the expenditure by RA subtypes. The National Broad Consumer Price Index was used to adjust the expenditures for December 2017. RESULTS The Ministry of Health allocated approximately $500 million to provide about 2 million units of biological drugs for RA patients from 2012 to 2017. The supply of adalimumab 40 mg and etanercept 50 mg accounted for 68.3% of the total expenditure. The subtypes "other rheumatoid arthritis with rheumatoid factor" (ICD-10 M05.8), "rheumatoid arthritis without rheumatoid factor" (ICD-10 M06.0), and "Felty's syndrome" (M05. 0) represented 84.5% of the total expenditures. The proportion of patients treated with biological drugs increased by 33.0%. There was a significant 83.0% increase in the number of patients using biological drugs compared to the overall number of RA patients treated during the study period. CONCLUSIONS The results obtained allow us to draw a more recent profile of expenditure on RA treatment and indicate trends in the use of biological drugs for this condition, generating data that can support management decisions in public health policies.

Gasto en salud y resultados en salud en América Latina y el Caribe / Health expenditure and health outcomes in Latin America and the Caribbean / Gastos em saúde e resultados de saúde na América Latina e no Caribe

RESUMEN Objetivo. Determinar el efecto del gasto público y privado en salud sobre los resultados en salud en los países de América Latina y el Caribe durante el periodo 2000-2019. Métodos. Se emplea una función de producción de la salud, donde se consideró a la esperanza de vida al nacer y la tasa de mortalidad infantil como indicadores del resultado en salud. Con datos para una muestra de 33 países para el periodo 2000-2019, se aplicó la técnica econométrica de datos panel. Resultados. Según las estimaciones, un incremento del 1% en el gasto público en salud está asociado a un aumento del 0,019% de la esperanza de vida. Del mismo modo, un incremento del 1% del gasto privado en salud aumenta en 0,023% la esperanza de vida. Para el caso del segundo resultado en salud, un incremento del 1% en el gasto público en salud reduce en -0,168% la tasa de mortalidad infantil. Sin embargo, el efecto del gasto privado en salud sobre la mortalidad infantil no es estadísticamente significativo. Conclusiones. Los resultados brindan evidencia del efecto del gasto público en salud para reducir la mortalidad infantil e incrementar la esperanza de vida, mientras que el gasto privado en salud presenta un efecto positivo solo sobre este último. Los hallazgos tienen importantes implicancias políticas para los países de la región ante un escenario postpandemia de limitado espacio fiscal.

ABSTRACT Objective. To determine the effect of public and private health expenditure on health outcomes in Latin American and Caribbean countries from 2000 to 2019. Methods. A health production function was used, wherein life expectancy at birth and infant mortality rate were considered as indicators of health outcomes. Panel data econometrics were applied, using data from a 33-country sample for the period from 2000 to 2019. Results. According to estimates, a 1% increase in public health expenditure is associated with a 0.019% increase in life expectancy, and a 1% increase in private health expenditure increases life expectancy by 0.023%. At the same time, a 1% increase in public health expenditure reduces the infant mortality rate by -0.168%, whereas the effect of private health expenditure on infant mortality is not statistically significant. Conclusions. The results provide evidence of the effect of public health expenditure in reducing infant mortality and increasing life expectancy, while private health expenditure has a positive effect only on the latter metric. The findings have important political implications for the countries of the Region in the post-pandemic context of limited fiscal space.

RESUMO Objetivo. Determinar os efeitos dos gastos públicos e privados em saúde sobre os resultados de saúde nos países da América Latina e do Caribe no período de 2000 a 2019. Métodos. Utilizamos uma função de produção da saúde, na qual a expectativa de vida ao nascer e a taxa de mortalidade infantil foram consideradas como indicadores dos resultados de saúde. Usando dados de uma amostra de 33 países no período de 2000 a 2019, aplicamos a técnica econométrica de dados em painel. Resultados. De acordo com as estimativas, um aumento de 1% nos gastos públicos em saúde está associado a um aumento de 0,019% na expectativa de vida. Da mesma forma, um aumento de 1% nos gastos privados em saúde resulta em um aumento de 0,023% na expectativa de vida. No que diz respeito ao segundo indicador, um aumento de 1% nos gastos públicos em saúde reduz a taxa de mortalidade infantil em -0,168%. Por outro lado, o efeito dos gastos privados em saúde sobre a mortalidade infantil não é estatisticamente significativo. Conclusões. Os resultados geram evidências sobre os efeitos dos gastos públicos em saúde na redução da mortalidade infantil e no aumento da expectativa de vida, enquanto que os gastos privados em saúde têm um efeito positivo apenas na expectativa de vida. Estes resultados têm implicações políticas importantes para os países da região, diante de um cenário pós-pandemia com espaço fiscal limitado.

Retorno ao trabalho após a alta da unidade de terapia intensiva: uma coorte multicêntrica brasileira / Return to work after discharge from the intensive care unit: a Brazilian multicenter cohort

RESUMO Objetivo: Descrever a taxa e os fatores relacionados ao não retorno ao trabalho no terceiro mês pós-alta da unidade de terapia intensiva, além dos impactos do desemprego, da perda de renda e dos gastos com saúde para os sobreviventes. Métodos: Estudo de coorte prospectivo multicêntrico, que incluiu sobreviventes da doença aguda grave, hospitalizados entre 2015 e 2018, previamente empregados, que permaneceram mais de 72 horas internados na unidade de terapia intensiva. Os desfechos foram avaliados por entrevista telefônica no terceiro mês após a alta. Resultados: Dos 316 pacientes incluídos no estudo que trabalhavam previamente, 193 (61,1%) não retornaram ao trabalho nos 3 meses após a alta da unidade de terapia intensiva. Foram associados ao não retorno ao trabalho: baixo nível educacional (razão de prevalência de 1,39; IC95% 1,10 - 1,74; p = 0,006), vínculo empregatício prévio (razão de prevalência de 1,32; IC95% 1,10 - 1,58; p = 0,003), necessidade de ventilação mecânica (razão de prevalência de 1,20; IC95% 1,01 - 1,42; p = 0,04) e dependência física no terceiro mês pós-alta (razão de prevalência de 1,27; IC95% 1,08 - 1,48; p = 0,003). Os sobreviventes incapazes de retornar ao trabalho mais frequentemente apresentaram redução da renda familiar (49,7% versus 33,3%; p = 0,008) e aumento dos gastos em saúde (66,9% versus 48,3%; p = 0,002) quando comparados àqueles que retornaram ao trabalho no terceiro mês após a alta da unidade de terapia intensiva. Conclusão: Frequentemente, os sobreviventes de unidade de terapia intensiva não retornam ao trabalho até o terceiro mês pós-alta da unidade de terapia intensiva. Baixo nível educacional, trabalho formal, necessidade de suporte ventilatório e dependência física no terceiro mês pós-alta relacionaram-se ao não retorno ao trabalho. O não retorno ao trabalho também se relacionou com redução na renda familiar e aumento dos custos com saúde após a alta da unidade de terapia intensiva.

ABSTRACT Objective: To describe the rate and factors related to nonreturn to work in the third month after discharge from the intensive care unit and the impact of unemployment, loss of income and health care expenses for survivors. Methods: This was a prospective multicenter cohort study that included survivors of severe acute illness who were hospitalized between 2015 and 2018, previously employed, and who stayed more than 72 hours in the intensive care unit. Outcomes were assessed by telephone interview in the third month after discharge. Results: Of the 316 patients included in the study who had previously worked, 193 (61.1%) did not return to work within 3 months after discharge from the intensive care unit. The following factors were associated with nonreturn to work: low educational level (prevalence ratio 1.39; 95%CI 1.10 - 1.74; p = 0.006), previous employment relationship (prevalence ratio 1.32; 95%CI 1 10 - 1.58; p = 0.003), need for mechanical ventilation (prevalence ratio 1.20; 95%CI 1.01 - 1.42; p = 0.04) and physical dependence in the third month after discharge (prevalence ratio 1.27; 95%CI 1.08 - 1.48; p = 0.003). Survivors who were unable to return to work more often had reduced family income (49.7% versus 33.3%; p = 0.008) and increased health expenditures (66.9% versus 48.3%; p = 0.002). compared to those who returned to work in the third month after discharge from the intensive care unit. Conclusion: Intensive care unit survivors often do not return to work until the third month after discharge from the intensive care unit. Low educational level, formal job, need for ventilatory support and physical dependence in the third month after discharge were related to nonreturn to work. Failure to return to work was also associated with reduced family income and increased health care costs after discharge.

El costo esperado de cáncer en Chile / The expected cost of cancer in Chile

BACKGROUND: Cancer is a public health priority in Chile. AIM: To estimate the expected annual cost of cancer in Chile, due to direct costs of health services, working allowances and indirect costs for productivity losses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We undertook an ascendent costing methodology to calculate direct costs. We built diagnostic, treatment and follow-up cost baskets for each cancer type. Further, we estimated the expenditure due to sick leave subsidies. Both estimates were performed either for the public or private sector. Costs related to productivity loss were estimated using the human capital approach, incorporating disease related absenteeism premature deaths. The time frame for all estimates was one year. RESULTS: The annual expected costs attributed to cancer was $1,557 billion of Chilean pesos. The health services expected annual costs were $1,436 billion, 67% of which are spent on five cancer groups (digestive, hematologic, respiratory, breast and urinary tract). The expected costs of sick leave subsidies and productivity loss were $48 and $71 billion, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer generates costs to the health system, which obliges health planners to allocate a significant proportion of the health budget to this disease. The expected costs estimated in this study are equivalent to 8.9% of all health expenditures and 0.69% of the Gross Domestic Product. This study provides an updated reference for future research, such as those aimed at evaluating the current health policies in cancer.

Epidemiological Analysis of 12 Years of Open Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in the Brazilian Public Health System

ABSTRACT Introduction: Although endovascular correction is a promising perspective, the gold-standard treatment for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurisms and type-B dissections with visceral involvement remains open surgery, particularly due to its well-established long-term durability. This study aims to describe and evaluate public data from patients treated for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurism in the Brazilian public health system in a 12-year interval. Methods: Data from procedures performed between 2008 and 2019 were extracted from the national public database (Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde, or DATASUS) using web scraping techniques. Procedures were evaluated regarding the yearly frequency of elective or urgency surgeries, in-hospital mortality, and governmental costs. All tests were done with a level of significance P<0.05. Results: A total of 812 procedures were analyzed. Of all surgeries, 67.98% were elective cases. There were 328 in-hospital deaths (mortality of 40.39%). In-hospital mortality was lower in elective procedures (26.92%) than in urgency procedures (46.74%) (P=0.008). Total governmental expenditure was $3.127.051,56 — an average of $3.774,22 for elective surgery and $3.791,93 for emergency surgery (P=0.999). Conclusion: The proportion of urgency procedures is higher than that recommended by international literature. Mortality was higher for urgent admissions, although governmental costs were equal for elective and urgent procedures; specialized referral centers should be considered by health policy makers.

Out-of-pocket expenditures associated with congenital zika syndrome in Brazil: an analysis of household health spending / Gastos out-of-pocket associados à síndrome congênita do vírus Zika no Brasil: uma análise dos gastos domiciliares em saúde

Objective: The study aims to estimate catastrophic health expenditures associated with the diagnosis and follow-up treatment of Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS) in children affected during the 2015-2016 epidemic in Brazil. Catastrophic health expenditures are defined as health spending that exceeds a predefined proportion of the household's total expenditures, exposing family members to financial vulnerability. Methods: Ninety-six interviews were held in the cities of Fortaleza and Rio de Janeiro in a convenience sample, using a questionnaire on sociodemographic characteristics and private household expenditures associated with the syndrome, which also allowed estimating catastrophic expenditures resulting from care for CZS. Results: Most of the mothers interviewed in the study were brown, under 34 years of age, unemployed, and reported a monthly family income of two minimum wages or less. Spending on medicines accounted for 77.6% of the medical expenditures, while transportation and food were the main components of nonmedical expenditures, accounting for 79% of this total. The affected households were largely low-income and suffered catastrophic expenditures due to the disease. Considering the family income metric, in 41.7% of the households, expenses with the child's disease exceeded 10% of the household income. Conclusion: Public policies should consider the financial and healthcare needs of these families to ensure adequate support for individuals affected by CZS.

Objetivo: O estudo tem como objetivo estimar os gastos catastróficos em saúde associados ao diagnóstico e acompanhamento do tratamento da síndrome congênita do Zika (SCZ) em crianças afetadas durante a epidemia de 2015-2016 no Brasil. Gastos catastróficos em saúde são definidos como gastos com saúde que excedem uma proporção predefinida dos gastos totais do domicílio, expondo os membros da família à vulnerabilidade financeira. Métodos: Foram realizadas 96 entrevistas nas cidades de Fortaleza e Rio de Janeiro numa amostra de conveniência, por meio de questionário sobre características sociodemográficas e gastos privados domiciliares associados à síndrome, o que também permitiu estimar gastos catastróficos decorrentes do cuidado à SCZ. Resultados: A maioria das mães entrevistadas no estudo era parda, com menos de 34 anos, desempregada e com renda familiar mensal igual ou inferior a dois salários mínimos. Os gastos com medicamentos representaram 77,6% dos gastos médicos, enquanto transporte e alimentação foram os principais componentes dos gastos não médicos, respondendo por 79% desse total. Os domicílios afetados eram, em grande parte, de baixa renda e sofreram gastos catastróficos devido à doença. Considerando a métrica de renda familiar, em 41,7% dos domicílios, os gastos com a doença da criança ultrapassaram 10% da renda familiar. Conclusão: As políticas públicas devem considerar as necessidades financeiras e de saúde dessas famílias para garantir o suporte adequado aos indivíduos acometidos pela SCZ.

Three years evaluation of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis absorption costing: perspective of the service provider compared to funds transfers from the public and private healthcare systems / Três anos de avaliação do custeio por absorção da diálise peritoneal e hemodiálise: perspectiva do prestador de serviços em comparação com o repasse de recursos dos sistemas de saúde público e privado

Abstract Introduction: 72% of renal replacement therapy (RRT) clinics in Brazil are private. However, regarding payment for dialysis therapy, 80% of the patients are covered by the Unified Health System (SUS) and 20% by private healthcare (PH). Objectives: To evaluate costs for peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) from the perspective of the service provider and compare with fund transfers from SUS and private healthcare. Methods: The absorption costing method was applied in a private clinic. Study horizon: January 2013 - December 2016. Analyzed variables: personnel, medical supplies, tax expenses, permanent assets, and labor benefits. The input-output matrix method was used for analysis. Results: A total of 27,666 HD sessions were performed in 2013, 26,601 in 2014, 27,829 in 2015, and 28,525 in 2016. There were 264 patients on PD in 2013, 348 in 2014, 372 in 2015, and 300 in 2016. The mean monthly cost of the service provider was R$ 981.10 for a HD session for patients with hepatitis B; R$ 238.30 for hepatitis C; R$197.99 for seronegative patients; and R$ 3,260.93 for PD. Comparing to fund transfers from SUS, absorption costing yielded a difference of -269.7% for hepatitis B, +10.2% for hepatitis C, -2.0% for seronegative patients, and -29.8% for PD. For PH fund transfers, absorption costing for hepatitis B yielded a difference of -50.2%, +64.24% for hepatitis C, +56.27% for seronegative patients, and +48.26 for PD. Conclusion: The comparison of costs of dialysis therapy from the perspective of the service provider with fund transfers from SUS indicated that there are cost constraints in HD and PD.

Resumo Introdução: 72% das clínicas de terapia renal substitutiva (TRS) no Brasil são privadas. Entretanto, quanto ao pagamento da terapia dialítica, o Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) cobre 80% dos pacientes e, a saúde privada (SP), 20%. Objetivos: Avaliar custos de diálise peritoneal (DP) e hemodiálise (HD) na perspectiva do prestador de serviços, comparando com repasses do SUS e saúde suplementar. Métodos: O método de custeio por absorção foi aplicado em clínica privada. Horizonte de estudo: Janeiro 2013 - Dezembro 2016. Variáveis analisadas: pessoal, suprimentos médicos, despesas tributárias, ativos permanentes, benefícios trabalhistas. Utilizou-se para análise o método da matriz de input-output. Resultados: Realizou-se um total de 27.666 sessões de HD em 2013, 26.601 em 2014, 27.829 em 2015, e 28.525 em 2016. Havia 264 pacientes em DP em 2013, 348 em 2014, 372 em 2015, e 300 em 2016. O custo médio mensal do prestador de serviços foi R$ 981,10 por sessão de HD para pacientes com hepatite B; R$ 238,30 para hepatite C; R$ 197,99 para pacientes soronegativos; R$ 3.260,93 para DP. Em comparação com repasses do SUS, o custeio por absorção mostrou uma diferença de -269,7% para hepatite B, +10,2% para hepatite C, -2,0% para pacientes soronegativos, e -29,8% para DP. Para repasses da SP, o custeio por absorção para hepatite B mostrou uma diferença de -50,2%, +64,24% para hepatite C, +56,27% para pacientes soronegativos, e +48,26 para DP. Conclusão: A comparação de custos da terapia dialítica da perspectiva do prestador de serviços com os repasses do SUS indicou que existem restrições de custos em HD e DP.

A bibliometric analysis of literature on the out-of-pocket expense in health in Latin America / Un análisis bibliométrico de la literatura sobre el gasto de bolsillo en salud en América Latina

Objetive:performabibliometricanalysisofthescientific production on out-of-pocket expense (OOPE) published in Latin America from the period 2002 to 2020 is conducted. we The study:use the Scopus database to select related articles about OOPE in LatinAmerica.Bibliometricindicatorswereanalyzedusing Bibliometrix and Biblioshiny R packages. we identified Findings:207 documents and 828 authors during the period 2002-2020. The number of publications increased (12.62% annual growth rate). "Salud Publica de Mexico" was the leading journals in number of publications. The majority of publications came from developing country collaboration with developed countries such as United States or United Kingdom. Mexico was the most productive and cited country in OOPE in Latin America. the documents Conclusions:publishedinjournalsrelatedtoOOPEinLatinAmericaare increasing, being Mexico the most productive and cited country in out-of-pocket expense fields in the region.

Objetivo: realizar un análisis bibliométrico de la producción científica sobre gasto de bolsillo publicada en América Latina desde el período 2002 al 2020. El estudio: se utilizó la base de datos Scopus para seleccionar artículos relacionados con gasto de bolsillo en América Latina. Los indicadores bibliométricos se analizaron utilizando los paquetes Bibliometrix y Biblioshiny R. Hallazgos: se identificaron 207 documentos y 888 autores durante el período 2002-2020. El número de publicaciones aumentó (tasa de crecimiento anual del 12,62%). "Salud Pública de México" fue la revista líder en número de publicaciones. La mayoría de las publicaciones provinieron de la colaboración de países en desarrollo con países desarrollados como Estados Unidos o Reino Unido. México fue el país más productivo y citado en OOPE en América Latina. Conclusiones: los documentos publicados en revistas relacionadas con OOPE en Latinoamérica van en aumento, siendo México el país más productivo y citado en rubros de gasto de bolsillo en la región.

Análise do financiamento federal do Sistema Único de Saúde para o enfrentamento da Covid-19 / Analysis of the federal funding of the Unified Health System to fight the COVID-19

RESUMO O objetivo deste artigo é o de analisar o financiamento federal do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) para o enfrentamento da pandemia da Covid-19 em 2020 e durante o primeiro quadrimestre de 2021 - períodos caracterizados como da primeira e da segunda ondas. Realizou-se pesquisa documental com levantamento de dados disponíveis em sítios eletrônicos oficiais. A pandemia se instalou no Brasil em fevereiro de 2020, no contexto do subfinanciamento crônico do SUS, que se aprofundou com o estrangulamento de dotações verificado a partir da Emenda Constitucional 95/2016, que definiu o teto das despesas primárias e o congelamento do piso federal do SUS até 2036, no mesmo valor do piso de 2017. Essa medida constitucional viabilizou o aprofundamento da política de austeridade fiscal pela via da redução das despesas primárias e da dívida pública em relação ao Produto Interno Bruto. Tais objetivos condicionaram também o financiamento federal para o combate à pandemia da Covid-19 em 2020 e 2021, cuja execução orçamentária e financeira pode ser caracterizada como reativa e retardatária. Essa forma de execução comprometeu o atendimento das necessidades de saúde da população, além de prejudicar a gestão do SUS nas esferas de governo subnacionais.

ABSTRACT The purpose of this article is to analyze the federal funding of the Unified Health System (SUS) to fight the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and during the first four months of 2021 - periods characterized as the first and second waves. Documentary research was carried out, with data available on official websites. The pandemic took hold in Brazil in February 2020, in the context of the chronic underfunding of SUS, which deepened with the strangulation of appropriations verified from the Constitutional Amendment 95/2016, which defined the ceiling on primary expenditure and the freezing of the federal floor of SUS until 2036, at the same value as the 2017 floor. This constitutional measure made it possible to deepen the fiscal austerity policy by reducing primary expenditure and public debt in relation to the Gross Domestic Product. These goals also conditioned federal funding to combat the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021, whose budget and financial execution can be characterized as reactive and delayed. This form of execution compromised meeting the health needs of the population, in addition to harming the management of SUS in subnational government spheres.

Gastos com antibacterianos de uso sistêmico e seus determinantes: uma análise de 2010 a 2015 no Estado de Minas Gerais / Expenditure on antibacterials for systemic use and its drivers: analysis between 2010 and 2015 in Minas Gerais State, Brazil

Resumo Introdução Antibacterianos sistêmicos são medicamentos amplamente utilizados e os gastos públicos com este grupo têm aumentado consideravelmente. Objetivo Avaliar os gastos com antibacterianos sistêmicos e seus determinantes, entre 2010 e 2015, no Estado de Minas Gerais. Método Estudo de Utilização de Medicamentos (EUM), longitudinal, com dados do banco de administração pública do Sistema Integrado de Administração de Materiais e Serviços de Minas Gerais (SIAD-MG). Foram estimados gastos e volumes totais por ano, bem como por subgrupo terapêutico. Os antibacterianos responsáveis pelo maior gasto foram identificados pelo método Drug Cost 90%. Análise de decomposição foi utilizada para avaliar os determinantes dos gastos, preço, volume ou escolha terapêutica. Resultados No período analisado houve uma redução de 22,2% nas despesas e de 25,5% no volume adquirido. As penicilinas corresponderam a 42% do total adquirido, sendo a amoxicilina, isolada ou em associação, o fármaco mais consumido. A redução das despesas, entre 2010 e 2015, foi determinada principalmente pela redução do volume (queda de 25%) e preços (queda de 5%). Conclusão A redução de volume no período pode ter impacto negativo na cobertura populacional. O investimento em agentes de amplo espectro, em fármacos de segunda linha de tratamento ou com pouca evidência clínica requerem a criação de protocolos clínicos universais que orientem a prescrição mais adequada.

Abstract Background Antibacterials for systemic use are widely used and public spending on these drugs has increased considerably. Objective To evaluate the expenditures with Antibacterials for systemic use and its drivers in the state of Minas Gerais, between 2010 and 2015. Method Longitudinal Drug Utilization Study, based on data from the public administration database SIAD-MG. Total expenditures and volumes were estimated per year and per therapeutic subgroup. Drug Cost 90% method was used to identify antibacterials responsible for the highest expenditure. Decomposition analysis was used to evaluate the determinants of expenditures (price, volume, or drug mix). Results There was a reduction in expenditure (22.2%) and in volume (25.5%) from 2010 to 2015. Penicillins corresponded to 42% of the total volume. Amoxicillin plain or in combination was responsible for consuming more than one-third of the budget. The reduction in expenditure between 2010 and 2015 was mainly determined by the reduction in volume (25%) and prices (5%). Conclusion Volume reduction in the period may harm population coverage. The investment in broad-spectrum agents, drugs considered the second line of treatment, or with little clinical evidence raises the need to create universal clinical protocols that guide the appropriate prescription.

Hospitalization, mortality and public healthcare expenditure in Brazil during the COVID-19 crisis: vulnerabilities in the spotlight

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Multiple opinion-based communications have highlighted the actions of the Brazilian government during the pandemic. Nevertheless, none have appraised public data to identify factors associated with worsening of the healthcare system. OBJECTIVE: To analyze and collate data from public health and treasury information systems in order to understand the escalating process of weakening of Brazilian healthcare and welfare since the beginning of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. DESIGN AND SETTING: Secondary data study conducted using multiple public databases administered by the Brazilian federal government. METHODS: We processed information from multiple national databases and appraised health and economic-related data. RESULTS: Based on our analyses, there were substantial reductions in inpatient hospital admissions and in the numbers of patients seeking primary care services, along with a decrease in immunization coverage. Moreover, we observed a considerable decline in government transfers to hospital services (reduction of 82.0%) and a diminution of public outlays in several healthcare-related subfunctions ("hospital and outpatient care", "primary care", "prophylactic and therapeutic support" and "epidemiological surveillance"). We observed an increase in the overall mortality rate over the period analyzed, especially regarding all group-based diseases. Notably, there were remarkable differences among geographic, racial, gender and other parameters, thus revealing the impact of vulnerabilities on COVID-19 outcomes. CONCLUSION: This assessment of documentation of public expenditure and the shrinkage of investment in sensitive areas of the healthcare system in Brazil emphasized areas that still require collective attention in order to guarantee national welfare.

Gastos catastróficos em saúde: análise da associação com condições socioeconômicas em Minas Gerais, Brasil / Catastrophic health expenditures: analysis of the association with socioeconomic conditions in Minas Gerais, Brazil

Resumo O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar os gastos catastróficos em saúde (GCS) e sua associação com condições socioeconômicas nos anos de 2009, 2011 e 2013 em Minas Gerais. Realizou-se um estudo transversal com dados da Pesquisa por Amostra de Domicílios. A variável dependente foi o GCS, em cada ano da pesquisa. Foram considerados catastróficos os gastos que ultrapassaram os limites de 10% e 25% da renda familiar. A associação entre o gasto catastrófico e as variáveis independentes foi testada por meio de regressão de Poisson. As prevalências de GCS variaram de 9,0% a 11,3% e 18,9% a 24,4% nos limites de 10% e 25%, sendo que o ano de 2011 apresentou os menores valores. A maior proporção dos gastos com saúde (94%) foi relativa aos gastos com medicamentos. A prevalência de CGS foi menor entre responsáveis pelo domicílio com maior escolaridade quando comparados àqueles sem estudo nos limites de 10% e 25%. Famílias com maior escore de riqueza apresentaram, nos dois limites, prevalência de GCS menores do que aquelas do primeiro quintil. Concluiu-se que os gastos com saúde afetaram significativamente o orçamento das famílias em Minas Gerais, sendo o gasto com medicamentos o principal componente dos gastos. Os achados reforçam o papel do SUS para minimizar o GCS e reduzir as desigualdades socioeconômicas.

Abstract This study aimed to assess catastrophic health expenditures (CHE) and its association with socioeconomic conditions in 2009, 2011 and 2013 in Minas Gerais, Brazil. A cross-sectional study was carried out with data from the Household Sample Survey. The dependent variable was the CHE in each year of the survey. Expenditures that exceeded 10% and 25% of household income were considered catastrophic. The association between catastrophic health expenditure and independent variables was tested by the Poisson regression. The prevalence of CHE ranged from 9.0% to 11.3% and 18.9% to 24.4% within the limits of 10% and 25%, and 2011 recorded the lowest values. The largest proportion of health expenditure (94%) was related to the acquisition of medicines. The prevalence of CHE was lower among those responsible for the household with 12 or more years of study than those with no formal education. Households with a higher wealth score had, in both limits, lower prevalence of CHE than those of the first quintile. We concluded that health expenditures significantly affected the budget of households in Minas Gerais and the purchase of medicines was the main component of spending. The findings reinforce the role of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) in minimizing CHE and reducing socioeconomic inequalities.

Farmers’ expenditures associated with children’s nutritional status in areas affected by Indonesia’s Sinabung eruption

@#Introduction: During the time of volcano eruptions, farmers have to harvest their crops before the stipulated harvest time, which leads to quality and quantity loss. Besides, farmers also have to continue their farming activities, including purchasing farming necessities. These unaddressed issues of the agricultural restoration could be one of the key factors to malnutrition. Therefore, this study assessed the associations between farmers’ expenditures and the nutritional status of children in areas affected by Indonesia’s Sinabung eruption. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out among 444 (158 farmers, 228 farmers cum farm labourers, and 58 farm labourers) households headed by farmers. The questionnaire used for data collection was the Indonesian Family Life Survey questions (IFLS). Results: Non-food expenditures had a huge impact on household livelihoods, which was significantly associated with children’s nutritional status. Among the three groups of farmers, children of farmers and farmers cum farm labourers were prone to malnutrition. This was because these two groups had to limit food expenditures over their farming necessities and cigarettes expenditure, which took more than half of their income. However, the prevalence of malnutrition was highest in children of farmers. Children of farm labourers had better nutritional status compared to children of the other two groups. Conclusion: Children of farmers and farmers cum farm labourers were prone to malnutrition due to limited expenditure on food. This study suggests that policymakers in Indonesia should provide food and nutrition security to children who were impacted by the Sinabung eruption.

Distortions of parliamentary amendments to the equitable allocation of federal resources to the PAB / Distorções das emendas parlamentares à alocação equitativa de recursos federais ao PAB

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Analyze the implications of parliamentary amendments (EP) for the model of equitable allocation of resources from the Fixed Primary Care Minimum (PAB-Fixo) to municipalities in the period from 2015 to 2019. METHODS A descriptive and exploratory study was conducted on allocating federal resources to the PAB-Fixo and on the increment in the PAB by parliamentary amendment. The municipalities were classified into four groups according to degrees of socioeconomic vulnerability defined by the Ministry of Health for the allocation of PAB-Fixo resources. The transfers from the Ministry by parliamentary amendment were identified. The proportions of municipalities benefiting per group were analyzed by resources allocated from the PAB-Fixo and increment to the minimum by EP. RESULTS There were reduced resources allocated to the PAB-Fixo (from R$ 6.04 billion to R$ 5.51 billion, -8.8%) and increased increment to PAB by parliamentary amendment (from R$ 95.06 million to R$ 5.58 billion, 5.767%) between 2015 and 2019. The participation of municipalities by the group of those favored by EP was similar to that in the PAB-Fixo. In the proportion of resources for amendments, the municipalities of group I (most vulnerable) had more participation, and those of group IV had less participation if compared to the allocation of the PAB-Fixo. The distribution of resources by the parliamentary amendment did not cover all municipalities, even the most vulnerable ones, i.e., belonging to groups I and II. There was great inequality of resources per capita according to the groups of municipalities. CONCLUSION The EP distorted the model of equitable allocation of resources proposed by the Ministry of Health for the PAB-Fixo, by allocating resources in a much more significant proportion to the municipalities of group I and much less to those of group IV, which is in disagreement with this model. Furthermore, this distribution by amendments does not benefit all municipalities, not even the most vulnerable.

RESUMO OBJETIVO Analisar as implicações das emendas parlamentares (EP) para o modelo de alocação equitativa de recursos do Piso da Atenção Básica Fixo (PAB-Fixo) aos municípios no período de 2015 a 2019. MÉTODOS Realizou-se um estudo descritivo e exploratório da alocação de recursos federais para o PAB-Fixo e para incremento ao PAB por emenda parlamentar. Os municípios foram classificados em quatro grupos, segundo graus de vulnerabilidade socioeconômica definidos pelo Ministério da Saúde para destinação de recursos do PAB-Fixo. Os repasses do ministério por emenda parlamentar foram identificados, analisando-se as proporções de municípios beneficiados em cada grupo por recursos alocados do PAB-Fixo e do incremento ao piso por EP. RESULTADOS Verificou-se redução dos recursos alocados ao PAB-Fixo (de R$ 6,04 bilhões para R$ 5,51 bilhões, -8,8%) e aumento do incremento ao PAB por emenda parlamentar (de R$ 95,06 milhões para R$ 5,58 bilhões, 5.767%) entre 2015 e 2019. A participação dos municípios por grupo dos que foram favorecidos por EP foi semelhante à dos municípios do PAB-Fixo. Na proporção de recursos por emendas, os municípios do grupo I (mais vulneráveis) tiveram maior participação e os do grupo IV, menor participação, se comparada à alocação do PAB-Fixo. A distribuição de recursos por emenda parlamentar não contemplou todos os municípios, mesmo aqueles mais vulneráveis, pertencentes aos grupos I e II. Houve grande desigualdade de recursos per capita segundo os grupos de municípios. CONCLUSÃO As EP distorceram o modelo de alocação equitativa de recursos proposto pelo Ministério da Saúde para o PAB-Fixo, ao destinar recursos em proporção muito maior para os municípios do grupo I e muito menor para os do grupo IV, o que está em desacordo com esse modelo, além disso essa distribuição por emendas não beneficia a todos os municípios, nem mesmo aos mais vulneráveis.

Gasto en atención primaria en salud en las Américas: medir lo que importa / Primary health care expenditure in the Americas: measuring what matters / Gasto em atenção primária à saúde nas Américas: calcular o que importa

RESUMEN En este informe especial se compara la medición del gasto en atención primaria en salud (APS) propuesta por la Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico (OCDE) y la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) según el marco mundial para reportar gastos en salud (SHA 2011) en tres países de la región de las Américas. Hay divergencias conceptuales: 1) la operacionalización como atención básica, por OCDE, o primer contacto, por OMS; 2) la mayor amplitud de bienes y servicios en la definición de OMS (incluye medicamentos, administración y servicios preventivos colectivos); 3) la consideración únicamente de servicios en proveedores ambulatorios en OCDE. Los gastos en APS como el porcentaje del gasto corriente en salud (GCS) en 2017 para OMS y OCDE, serían: México (43,6% vs 15.1%); República Dominicana (41,1 vs 5,75%) y Costa Rica (31,4% vs 5,7%); superarían la meta del 30% del GCS en APS que propone el Pacto 30-30-30 de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud, con la definición de la OMS y estarían muy lejos de alcanzarla con la de la OCDE. La definición amplia de APS como primer contacto de OMS facilita la inclusión de servicios que reflejan la forma en que los países ofrecen atención a su población. Aun así, la OMS podría mejorar las descripciones de las categorías incluidas para fines de comparación internacional. Restringir la APS a proveedores ambulatorios como hace OCDE limita mucho la medición y excluye intervenciones intrínsecas al concepto de APS, como servicios colectivos de prevención. Como paso transitorio se recomienda a los países que monitoreen el financiamiento de la APS, explicitando qué incluyen en su definición. El SHA 2011 permite identificar y comparar estas diferencias.

ABSTRACT This special report compares the measurement of primary health care (PHC) expenditure proposed by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and by the World Health Organization (WHO), according to the global framework for reporting health expenditures (SHA 2011) in three countries in the Region of the Americas. There are conceptual differences: 1) operationalization as basic care, by OECD, versus first contact, by WHO; 2) a wider range of goods and services in the WHO definition (including medicines, administration, and collective preventive services); and 3) consideration only of services in outpatient providers by OECD. PHC expenditures as a percentage of current healthcare spending in 2017 for WHO and OECD: Mexico (43.6% vs. 15.1%); Dominican Republic (41.1% vs. 5.75%), and Costa Rica (31.4% vs. 5.7%). The 30% target for current healthcare spending on PHC proposed by Compact 30-30-30 (Pan American Health Organization) would be surpassed by the WHO definition, but it would be far from achieved by the OECD definition. The broad WHO definition of PHC as first contact facilitates inclusion of services that reflect the way countries provide care to their populations. Even so, WHO could improve its category descriptions for the purposes of international comparison. Restricting PHC to outpatient providers (as the OECD does) greatly limits measurement and excludes interventions intrinsic to the concept of PHC, such as collective preventive services. As a transitional step, we recommend that countries should monitor PHC funding and should explain what they include in their definition. SHA 2011 makes it possible to identify and compare these differences.

RESUMO Este informe especial apresenta uma comparação entre o cálculo do gasto em atenção primária à saúde (APS) conforme os métodos propostos pela Organização para a Cooperação e o Desenvolvimento Econômico (OCDE) e pela Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS), segundo a metodologia System of Health Accounts (SHA 2011), em três países da Região das Américas. Observam-se divergências conceituais entre os métodos: 1) operacionalização do conceito como atenção básica pela OCDE ou primeiro contato pela OMS; 2) maior abrangência de bens e serviços de acordo com a definição da OMS (englobando medicamentos, administração e serviços de prevenção em âmbito coletivo) e 3) inclusão única de serviços ambulatoriais de acordo com a OCDE. Os gastos em APS como percentual do gasto corrente em saúde (GCS) em 2017, de acordo com os métodos propostos pela OMS e pela OCDE, foram: 43,6% vs. 15,1% no México; 41,1 vs. 5,75% na República Dominicana; e 31,4% vs. 5,7% na Costa Rica. Esses valores ultrapassam a meta de 30% do GCS em APS sugerida no Pacto 30.30.30 da Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde, com a definição proposta pela OMS, e essa meta estaria longe de ser alcançada com a definição proposta pela OCDE. A definição ampla de APS como primeiro contato que é proposta pela OMS permite incluir os diferentes serviços de atenção existentes nos países. No entanto, as categorias deveriam ser mais bem detalhadas para facilitar a comparação internacional. Por outro lado, a proposta da OECD restringe a APS aos prestadores de serviços ambulatoriais, o que limita muito o cálculo e exclui intervenções próprias do conceito de APS, como serviços de prevenção no âmbito coletivo. Numa etapa de transição, recomenda-se aos países monitorar o financiamento da APS, explicitando os itens incluídos na definição empregada. A metodologia SHA 2011 possibilita identificar e comparar essas diferenças.